![]() ![]() ![]() Who's first party are more consistent? Look at the growth from Insomniac, Housemarque, Bluepoint, Guerrilla, Sucker Punch, even ND and Santa Monica over the yrs. ![]() You can jest like cultivating relationships organically over yrs or decades has no benefit but look the results. These companies are competing but they would not intentionally sabotage their own game only because it's on another platform. Sony has also not gimped MLB: The Show even when the game appears day and date on Game Pass. MS has continued to support Minecraft on all other platforms and hasn't gimped the game for Playstation, they are also releasing the next Minecraft Legends on Playstation. There has been zero evidence of this ever happening between the two, so it doesn't make any type of sense to base discussions off of what if's and maybe's. "What happens down the road? What if they gimp Playstation versions? Etc." There were special cases with Zenimax where contracts were honored, now that those have been fulfilled, they're moving to focus on Xbox. We all know that first party developers make games for the platform holders that own them. I really don't understand why all of a sudden other people, especially on this site are now having a hard time understanding how first party studios function. Sony has been actively buying third party games and making them timed exclusives or straight up exclusives. Not sure if you're referring to Sony with this line, because in this instance, MS has bought an entire publisher and has made their future games exclusive to the Xbox platforms. Gangsta_red 133d a company has the cash to buy exclusives from its competition (potentially the majority of the industry), and has shown they want to, it could be a problem for said industry." ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |